Latest Article

Zero-Hop CTV: How Publishers Collapse Intermediaries to Reclaim Margin, Control, and Speed

Zero-hop CTV helps publishers compress the ad supply chain to lift yield, cut latency, and regain control. Here is the architecture, playbook, and KPIs.

Zero-Hop CTV: How Publishers Collapse Intermediaries to Reclaim Margin, Control, and Speed

Introduction: The Case for Zero-Hop CTV

CTV is scaling fast, yet too many publishers still rely on a chain of intermediaries that erode yield, slow delivery, and muddle measurement. Procurement teams at major brands are running supply path optimization to find the shortest, most trusted routes to inventory. Meanwhile, publishers are asking a simple question: what does it take to deliver a direct, verifiable, and low-latency path from my screen to the buyer seat? Zero-hop CTV is the answer many are converging on. It is not magic, and it is not dogma. Zero-hop is a practical approach that compresses the supply chain to the smallest viable set of components that preserve quality, compliance, and liquidity. Think fewer middle layers, tighter controls, stronger economics. This piece explains what zero-hop CTV really means in practice, why it is possible now, and how to execute it with limited risk. We will cover reference architectures, standards that matter, a migration playbook, pitfalls to avoid, and the KPIs that prove success. Along the way, we will connect the dots on how publisher research, tech stack intelligence, ads.txt and sellers.json hygiene, and CTV-specific data all underpin a durable zero-hop strategy.

What Zero-Hop CTV Actually Means

The phrase zero-hop can be misunderstood. No publisher operates completely without partners. The point is to minimize unnecessary hops between your ad decisioning and the buyer seat, while ensuring measurement, brand safety, and privacy signals are delivered intact. Here is a simple taxonomy to anchor the concept.

  • Multi-hop CTV: Publisher SSAI sends ad requests to an SSP that sends to an exchange that fans out to multiple resellers before reaching major DSPs. Multiple entities insert fees, rewrite bidstream metadata, and add latency.
  • Fewer-hop CTV: Publisher consolidates SSP partners, removes resellers, and integrates one or two direct pipes with top DSPs. Still viable where a single path cannot cover all demand.
  • Zero-hop CTV: Publisher ad decisioning calls a minimal gateway that connects directly to the buyer seat or a single exchange that is contractually and technically direct. Supply path objects and contractual declarations prove no resellers. SSAI remains, but it is not a monetization intermediary.

A zero-hop path is “direct” by contract and by machine-readable signals. In practice, you will still use SSAI or CSAI, an ad server, and possibly a single exchange or direct DSP pipe. The hop count refers to intermediary monetization layers, not operational utilities like SSAI.

The Economics of Hops: Why Compression Pays

Every hop adds cost, latency, and risk. For CTV, the stakes are high because pods are fewer, timeouts are tight, and every failed ad can degrade the viewing experience.

  • Take-rate stacking: Multiple intermediaries each extract a fee. Even modest increments stack. Collapsing resellers and duplicative SSPs can restore meaningful net CPM to the publisher.
  • Latency and timeouts: Server-side ad insertion windows are unforgiving. Fewer network round-trips mean higher fill and better pod completion rates. Lower latency also reduces fallback to lower-value house ads.
  • Signal integrity: Each hop can drop or alter supply chain objects, app/site identifiers, and privacy flags. Fewer transformations mean better buyer trust and less bid throttling.
  • Verification and measurement: Security primitives like ads.cert and signed requests are easier to implement and audit when you collapse partners.
  • Operational complexity: Fewer contracts, fewer reconciliation streams, and fewer exception paths reduce revenue leakage and finance overhead.

The goal is simple: improve effective yield per impression while maintaining or improving quality and compliance.

Why Zero-Hop Is Feasible Now

Several industry shifts have made a leaner supply path both viable and attractive.

  • Buyer-driven SPO: Agency holding companies and large advertisers publicly prioritize direct, transparent paths to supply. Publishers that can prove “clean routes” win preferential spend.
  • Standards maturity: ads.txt and app-ads.txt, sellers.json, and SupplyChain Object are widely supported. OpenRTB 2.6 improves pod bidding and CTV controls. Authentication projects like ads.cert strengthen trust.
  • SSAI normalization: SSAI vendors and publisher-operated SSAI now expose more robust identifiers and event beacons, making direct demand safer.
  • CTV liquidity concentration: Much of the CTV programmatic spend aggregates into a handful of buyer platforms. Direct pipes to those platforms can cover a large share of demand.
  • Privacy evolution: Lightweight identity and consent frameworks encourage passing only necessary signals. Less duplication of vendors means fewer data processors and simpler compliance narratives.

Standards references for context:

  • IAB Tech Lab ads.txt and app-ads.txt: https://iabtechlab.com/standards/ads-txt/
  • sellers.json and SupplyChain Object: https://iabtechlab.com/standards/sellers-json/
  • OpenRTB 2.6 specifications: https://iabtechlab.com/standards/openrtb/
  • Global Privacy Platform: https://iabtechlab.com/standards/gpp/
  • VAST specification: https://iabtechlab.com/standards/vast/
  • OM SDK for CTV: https://iabtechlab.com/omsdk/
  • ads.cert authentication: https://iabtechlab.com/ads-cert/

    A Reference Architecture for Zero-Hop CTV

    There is no single blueprint, but high-performing publishers converge on a similar pattern.

    Core components

    • Inventory and pod manager: Controls ad pods, duration thresholds, competitive separation, and content metadata exposure.
    • SSAI or CSAI: Performs server-side stitching or client-side rendering. SSAI is common for TV-like experiences and reduces client fragmentation.
    • Ad decisioning brain: Your ad server or decisioning layer that enforces priority rules, direct-sold insertion, programmatic deals, and fallback logic.
    • Direct exchange or DSP pipes: A small set of direct connections to buyer platforms. Contractually direct and declared as such in app-ads.txt and sellers.json.
    • Verification and measurement: OM SDK for CTV where applicable, content signals, and third-party verification that aligns with buyer requirements.
    • Billing and reconciliation: Clear log-level data, match keys, and standardized reporting to close the books with minimal breakage.

    Data and identity

    • Contextual and content metadata: Genre, episode, channel, and rating. Support buyers’ brand safety and planning needs without oversharing personal data.
    • Device and session identifiers: Where permitted, pass platform IDs like Roku publisher ID, Amazon Fire TV signals, or device-level identifiers. Many CTV stacks lean on household or session-based identifiers and IP signals, but use them prudently.
    • Privacy flags: Pass GPP strings, LMT flags, and jurisdictional indicators consistently.
    • SupplyChain Object: Prove the directness of the path to buyers.

    Zero-Hop in Practice: Contracts, Declarations, and Bidstream Hygiene

    A zero-hop claim must be visible in contracts and visible on the wire. Here are the primary artifacts buyers and auditors will check.

    app-ads.txt and ads.txt

    Publishers should enumerate only the authorized direct selling accounts and clearly label direct relationships. Removing reseller lines or migrating them behind a single direct seat is a major step. Example app-ads.txt for a CTV app:

    # app-ads.txt for com.acme.ctvapp
example-exchange.com, 1234, DIRECT, ABCDE12345
big-dsp-exchange.net, 9876, DIRECT, ZYXWV99999
# If you must list a reseller, do so intentionally and sparingly
trusted-ssp.io, 5555, RESELLER, QQQQQ11111

    Keep the file current. Automate validation and alerting to prevent drift.

    sellers.json

    If you operate a selling platform or work with one, ensure seller types and inventory relationships are truthful and stable. Buyers look for coherent stories across sellers.json, app-ads.txt, and the schain object. Example sellers.json snippet:

    {
"sellers": [
{
"seller_id": "pub-1234",
"name": "Acme Media Networks",
"domain": "acmemedianetworks.tv",
"seller_type": "PUBLISHER",
"is_confidential": 0
},
{
"seller_id": "pub-1234-direct",
"name": "Acme Media Networks Direct",
"domain": "acmedirect.tv",
"seller_type": "INTERMEDIARY",
"is_confidential": 0
}
]
}

    SupplyChain Object (schain)

    Your OpenRTB requests should include a compact, truthful schain. A direct path looks like this:

    {
"source": {
"ext": {
"schain": {
"ver": "1.0",
"complete": 1,
"nodes": [
{
"asi": "acmedirect.tv",
"sid": "pub-1234-direct",
"hp": 1,
"rid": "req-abc-789",
"name": "Acme Direct Exchange",
"domain": "acmedirect.tv"
}
]
}
}
}
}

    Avoid chains with multiple intermediary nodes unless absolutely necessary and disclosed in your app-ads.txt.

    OpenRTB 2.6 for CTV: Pod Bidding and Stream Controls

    OpenRTB 2.6 refined several elements for CTV and long-form video. Using these features reduces friction for buyers and creates better economics for publishers. Key elements to implement:

    • Structured pods: Represent pods with clear slot durations and competitive separation to reduce creative conflicts and improve buyer control.
    • Channel and content signals: Use content objects for genre, network, and language to help buyers plan and verify against brand safety policies.
    • Ad slot and max duration: Enforce sensible duration caps per slot to reduce pod-level fatigue and maintain spot quality.
    • Crid and category hygiene: Pass creative IDs and standardized categories consistently to unlock frequency and conflict management on the buy side.

    Example OpenRTB 2.6 video object for a 90-second pod split into three slots:

    {
"imp": [
{
"id": "1",
"video": {
"mimes": ["video/mp4", "video/quicktime"],
"minduration": 15,
"maxduration": 30,
"protocols": [7, 8, 10],
"w": 1920,
"h": 1080,
"startdelay": 0,
"placement": 4,
"playbackmethod": [1],
"poddur": 90,
"slotinpod": 1,
"minbitrate": 1500,
"maxbitrate": 6000,
"linearity": 1
},
"pmp": {
"private_auction": 1,
"deals": [
{"id": "PG-BrandA-Exclusive", "bidfloor": 28.0, "at": 2}
]
}
}
],
"site": {
"name": "Acme CTV Channel",
"domain": "acmetv.example",
"content": {
"episode": 5,
"title": "Cooking Live",
"series": "Kitchen Nights",
"genre": "Lifestyle",
"language": "en",
"livestream": 0
}
},
"regs": {
"gpp": "DBAABB...",
"gpp_sid": [7, 9]
},
"source": { "tid": "req-abc-789" }
}

    Note: Set slotinpod in subsequent impressions if you split the pod across multiple parallel impressions. Details vary based on your decisioning strategy.

    Authentication and Security: ads.cert and SSAI Integrity

    CTV buyers worry about SSAI spoofing and misrepresented inventory. Authentication projects such as ads.cert aim to cryptographically prove the origin of bid requests and creative events.

    • Signed bid requests: Use private keys to sign the request or parts of it so DSPs can verify the source.
    • Event-level authentication: Sign impression and quartile events to reduce falsified playback signals.
    • Key rotation and incident response: Maintain disciplined rotation schedules and monitor for anomalies in signature verification failure rates.

    Pair authentication with robust fraud monitoring and frequent inventory reviews. Eliminate ambiguous resellers that cannot pass your authentication standards.

    The Zero-Hop Playbook: From Inventory Map to Revenue Lift

    Here is a pragmatic plan most CTV publishers can execute within one to two quarters.

    1) Build a truthful inventory and path map

    • Inventory audit: Catalog channels, apps, device classes, content types, and pod policies. Identify high-value versus remnant segments.
    • Demand map: List buyers, DSPs, and deal types driving 80 percent of revenue. Identify duplication across intermediaries.
    • Path diagnostics: Compare app-ads.txt entries, sellers.json declarations, and schain nodes against contracts. Remove or consolidate redundant paths.

    2) Consolidate partners and contracts

    • Rationalize SSPs: If three partners provide overlapping access to the same buyers, pick one strategic partner for open market plus one direct pipe to a top DSP for PMPs and PG.
    • Negotiate take rates and data rights: Zero-hop is about economics and control. Ensure log-level access, data usage limits, and transparent fee schedules.
    • Set a deprecation plan: Create a 60 to 90 day sunset schedule for deprecated resellers, with clear communication to buyers to migrate deals.

    3) Harden bidstream hygiene and standards compliance

    • Clean app-ads.txt: Remove stale or redundant reseller lines. Align with your sellers.json and schain.
    • Implement OpenRTB 2.6 features: Especially pod and content signals. Test with a few buyers first.
    • Adopt ads.cert where feasible: Start with signing bid requests in your direct pipes.

    4) Optimize SSAI and decisioning

    • Reduce timeouts: Tighten SLA with your exchange or DSP pipe. Prioritize lower-latency partners.
    • Re-rank waterfall to favor direct: PG first, preferred PMPs second, open exchange last. Consider demand capping rules per buyer.
    • Frequency controls: Share creative IDs and enforce frequency targets per session and per household where applicable.

    5) Measurement, QA, and finance alignment

    • Event QA: Validate quartile events and completion rates across all partners post-consolidation.
    • Log-level reconciliation: Establish deterministic join keys and a monthly close process with variance thresholds.
    • Buyer comms: Proactively notify top buyers of improved path and expected performance uplifts.

    Practical Code and Config Examples

    A few concrete artifacts help make this real.

    Prebid Server configuration for CTV PMP prioritization

    Even in a zero-hop model, some publishers use Prebid Server as a routing and pre-auction layer, especially for complex PMP logic. Here is a simplified YAML-style illustration.

    
ad_units:
  • code: "ctv_pod_90s" media_types: video: playerSize: [1920, 1080] context: instream minduration: 15 maxduration: 30 protocols: [2, 5, 7, 8] poddur: 90 bids:
  • bidder: directdsp params: accountId: "pub-1234-direct" deals: ["PG-BrandA-Exclusive", "PMP-Premium-30s"]
  • bidder: fallbackexchange params: accountId: "pub-1234-ex" floor: 15.00 priorities:
  • name: "programmatic_guaranteed" match: deals: ["PG-BrandA-Exclusive"] action: accept
  • name: "pmp_premium" match: deals: ["PMP-Premium-30s"] action: accept
  • name: "open_market" action: accept timeouts: s2s_timeout_ms: 300 
    ### A lightweight reconciliation join in Python
Use deterministic keys and allow for SSAI clock skews.
```python
import pandas as pd
pub = pd.read_parquet("pub_ssai_events_2025-08-01.parquet")   # contains tid, crid, pod_id, price
buyer = pd.read_parquet("buyer_bidwon_2025-08-01.parquet")     # contains tid, crid, pod_id, price
# Normalize keys
for df in (pub, buyer):
df["tid"] = df["tid"].str.lower().str.strip()
df["pod_id"] = df["pod_id"].astype(str)
# Join
matched = pub.merge(buyer, on=["tid","crid","pod_id"], suffixes=("_pub","_buyer"))
matched["price_diff"] = matched["price_pub"] - matched["price_buyer"]
# Variance thresholds
out_of_tolerance = matched[matched["price_diff"].abs() > 0.05]
print(f"Matched: {len(matched)}, OOT: {len(out_of_tolerance)}")
# Unmatched diagnostics
unmatched_pub = pub[~pub["tid"].isin(matched["tid"])]
unmatched_buyer = buyer[~buyer["tid"].isin(matched["tid"])]
unmatched_pub.to_csv("unmatched_pub.csv", index=False)
unmatched_buyer.to_csv("unmatched_buyer.csv", index=False)

    Signed SupplyChain example field in an extension

    If your partner supports signed schain nodes, you might attach a signature:

    {
"source": {
"ext": {
"schain": {
"ver": "1.0",
"complete": 1,
"nodes": [
{
"asi": "acmedirect.tv",
"sid": "pub-1234-direct",
"hp": 1,
"rid": "req-abc-789",
"name": "Acme Direct Exchange",
"domain": "acmedirect.tv",
"ext": {
"ads_cert": {
"sig": "MEUCIFOc9L9Z...==",
"alg": "ed25519"
}
}
}
]
}
}
}
}

    KPIs That Matter for Zero-Hop

    To judge whether you have earned the right to keep a compressed path, track before and after metrics at a pod and account level.

    • Net eCPM lift: Publisher net revenue per thousand impressions, normalized for content and seasonality.
    • Fill rate and pod completion: Particularly the percentage of pods with all planned slots filled at or above floor.
    • Timeout and error rates: Measured at SSAI and partner endpoints.
    • Creative conflict and brand safety incidents: Should decrease with better control and signaling.
    • Buyer concentration risk: Monitor share of revenue by buyer and by pipe to avoid single-pipe dependency.
    • Finance variance: Reconciliation variance between publisher and buyer logs as a percentage of revenue.

    Risk Map and How to Mitigate

    Zero-hop is compelling, but not free of tradeoffs.

    • Liquidity gaps: Collapsing partners can temporarily reduce bid density. Mitigation: phase migration and maintain a fallback SSP while direct pipes ramp.
    • Single-point dependency: A single exchange or DSP pipe can become critical infrastructure. Mitigation: operate two direct routes with independent SLAs.
    • Buyer disruption: Moving deals can interrupt pacing. Mitigation: proactive communications and joint QA with top buyers.
    • Data compliance scope: Fewer partners reduce processors, but direct buyer pipes increase your role as a controller. Mitigation: revisit data maps and DPA addenda.
    • Measurement changes: Some verification vendors may need re-integration. Mitigation: include verification tests in the migration plan.

    Build vs Partner: Choosing Your Zero-Hop Stack

    Publishers have two main approaches.

    • Build-light, partner-smart: Operate your SSAI and decisioning, then connect to a single direct-capable exchange plus one or two direct DSP pipes. Lean on well-supported SDKs and standard protocols. Fast time to value with modest engineering lift.
    • Build-heavy: Create a proprietary supply gateway and ad platform. Maximum control, but high capex and ongoing maintenance. Best for very large networks with strong engineering and finance operations.

    Decision criteria to weigh:

    • Scale of inventory and buyer demand: Larger, more diversified networks benefit more from bespoke routing.
    • Engineering bandwidth: Can you maintain protocol updates, auth keys, and buyer integrations continuously?
    • Finance operations maturity: Log-level reconciliation and dispute management are non-optional in a direct model.
    • Strategic optionality: Zero-hop should not block bespoke partnerships or guaranteed deals.

    The Buyer Perspective: Why They Prefer Fewer, Cleaner Paths

    Top buyers adopt SPO for reasons that align with publisher interests.

    • Lower tech tax: Fees fall when hops are removed, enabling higher working media.
    • Predictability: Fewer intermediaries reduce bidstream mutations and make pacing more stable.
    • Brand safety: Authentication, durable identifiers, and clean supply chains reduce fraud risk.
    • Negotiation clarity: Direct commercial relationships streamline troubleshooting and alignment on outcomes.

    When publishers present a clean path backed by standards and measurement, buyers reward it with deal consolidation and better pricing.

    A Phased Migration Timeline

    A realistic cadence avoids revenue shocks.

    • Weeks 0 to 2: Complete inventory and path map. Draft comms to buyers. Pick two strategic pipes.
    • Weeks 3 to 6: Integrate OpenRTB 2.6 fields, harden app-ads.txt, and enable initial direct pipe in canary channels.
    • Weeks 7 to 10: Migrate top 10 PMPs and one PG to the new direct path. Instrument KPIs. Run dual paths in parallel where needed.
    • Weeks 11 to 14: Deprecate redundant resellers. Expand to remainder of channels. Negotiate new fee schedules with remaining partners.

    Throughout, schedule weekly reviews with revenue, engineering, and finance to evaluate progress and variances.

    Where Standards and Policy Meet: Privacy and Consent in CTV

    CTV privacy regimes continue to evolve. Zero-hop simplifies compliance by reducing processors, but raises the bar for what you must signal and store.

    • GPP strings: Pass Global Privacy Platform signals with correct section IDs. Keep jurisdiction mappings current.
    • Limited data models: Favor session, content, and device-class level signals over persistent identifiers when not needed.
    • Data retention: Define retention periods for log-level data used for reconciliation versus modeling.
    • Vendor management: Maintain an up-to-date register of vendors and subprocessors across SSAI, verification, and pipes.

    Relevant starting points:

  • GPP overview: https://iabtechlab.com/standards/gpp/
  • VAST guidance for privacy considerations: https://iabtechlab.com/standards/vast/

    How Zero-Hop Changes Revenue Strategy

    Even the best architecture fails without a matching commercial strategy.

    • Portfolio pricing: Rebalance floors to account for reduced fees. A cleaner path can support higher floors without hurting win rates.
    • Deal consolidation: Consolidate overlapping PMPs and push programmatic guaranteed where demand is consistent.
    • Seasonality planning: Protect direct paths during high-CPM periods and use fallback exchange demand for shoulder periods.
    • Supply packaging: Offer high-signal curated packages that buyers can trust: genre bundles, brand-safe live events, or tentpole series.

    Benchmarks and What Good Looks Like

    While each business is different, teams that execute well typically report:

    • Net eCPM lift: Mid-to-high single digit percentage gains within the first quarter post-migration as take-rate stacking shrinks.
    • Timeout reduction: Double-digit percentage reduction in ad decisioning and delivery time by removing unnecessary network calls.
    • Variance improvement: Lower monthly reconciliation variance due to fewer log sources and clearer contracts.
    • Buyer consolidation: Top 10 buyers moved to a single clean path with stable pacing.

    These are directional and depend on mix, content, and buyer readiness. Treat them as targets to calibrate your plan.

    The Red Volcano Point of View: Data Intelligence as the Zero-Hop Force Multiplier

    Red Volcano specializes in supply-side intelligence across web, app, and CTV. Zero-hop is a data problem as much as it is a plumbing problem. The best migrations start with superior visibility. How Red Volcano supports zero-hop initiatives:

    • Publisher and buyer discovery: Identify which DSP seats and agency groups are the true sources of your demand. Prioritize direct pipes that cover your top accounts.
    • Technology stack tracking: Map SSAI providers, ad servers, and exchange partners used by your peers and competitors. De-risk vendor selection with real-world adoption data.
    • ads.txt and sellers.json monitoring: Detect unauthorized resellers, outdated entries, and alignment issues. Alert your team before buyers spot inconsistencies.
    • SDK and CTV app intelligence: See which SDKs and CTV platform integrations drive better monetization stability and signal quality.
    • Market and pricing signals: Benchmark CPMs and demand patterns, so you can model floors and deal consolidation with confidence.
    • Sales outreach enablement: Equip your teams with verified contacts and messaging to transition buyers to your clean path quickly.

    A data-first approach lets you collapse the chain without losing liquidity, since you know exactly which pipes and partners matter most.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Is zero-hop the same as going direct-only and dropping exchanges?

    Not necessarily. Many publishers keep one strategic exchange or marketplace that is contractually direct and technically lean. Zero-hop is about eliminating unnecessary resellers and duplicative paths, not eliminating liquidity.

    Do buyers actually pay more for zero-hop paths?

    Buyers often shift spend toward cleaner routes and accept higher floors when delivery and verification improve. The net effect is usually better working media and lower risk for the buyer, which sustains higher clearing prices.

    Can I achieve zero-hop with multiple SSAI vendors?

    Yes, but it raises the bar for coordination and consistency in identifiers and event beacons. Many publishers centralize SSAI for their most premium inventory to simplify.

    How do I know which resellers to keep?

    Keep the ones that verifiably deliver unique demand and value beyond simple access. Demand uniqueness should be observable in your logs and confirmed by your buyer roster. Everyone else should be consolidated or removed.

    A Note on Industry References

    Publishers and buyers can ground decisions in well-documented standards:

  • IAB Tech Lab Standards: ads.txt and app-ads.txt, sellers.json, SupplyChain Object, OpenRTB 2.6, VAST, GPP, OM SDK, and ads.cert. See https://iabtechlab.com/standards/
  • Industry analysis: Publications like AdExchanger and Digiday regularly cover SPO and CTV monetization dynamics. Use them to triangulate trends with your first-party data. These references provide stable scaffolding, but your log-level data is the ultimate truth source for decisions.

    Conclusion: Compress the Path, Expand the Opportunity

    Zero-hop CTV is a disciplined way to reclaim margin, reduce latency, and strengthen buyer trust. The approach favors clarity over complexity, standards over custom hacks, and verifiable signals over guesswork. Start with a precise inventory and path map. Consolidate partners with intent. Harden your bidstream with OpenRTB 2.6, app-ads.txt, sellers.json, schain, and authentication. Phase migration to protect liquidity. Measure relentlessly. Done well, zero-hop is not just a cost-saving exercise. It becomes a growth engine that enables cleaner deals, better audience experiences, and stronger commercial relationships. With the right data intelligence and operational playbook, publishers can own their path and build a healthier business around it. Red Volcano is here to help with the discovery, monitoring, and decision intelligence that turn the idea of zero-hop into measurable revenue lift and operational calm. If you are ready to compress your path and expand your opportunity, this is the moment to move.